This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you consent to our use of cookies. Close

Africa Legal

Africa Legal

  • NEWS
  • JOBS
  • COURSES
  • CLIENTS
    • Sign in
    • Sign up
  • NEWS
  • COURSES
  • JOBS
    • Sign In
    • Sign Up
  • News
  • Courses
  • Jobs
  • Events
  • Business A-Z
  • Post a job
  • Contact Us
  • Clients
CLIENT SIGN IN
Country
  • Uganda
  • South Africa
  • Kenya
  • Nigeria
  • Cameroon
  • United Kingdom
  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Ghana
  • Tanzania
  • Zambia
  • Botswana
  • Morocco
  • Zimbabwe
  • Mauritius
  • Mozambique
  • Sudan
  • Rwanda
  • Ethiopia
  • Angola
  • Egypt
  • Togo
  • Mali
  • South Sudan
  • Swaziland
  • Senegal
  • Malawi
  • France
  • Guinea
  • Middle East
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Gambia
  • Sierra Leone
  • Germany
Category
  • Profiles
  • Analysis & Opinion
  • Career advice
  • In-house
  • Latest news
  • Press releases
  • Africa Legal Blog
  • Women in Law
  • Innovation
  • Human Rights
Practice area
  • Agriculture
  • Arbitration
  • Aviation
  • Banking and Finance
  • Capital markets
  • Charties and pro bono
  • Company commercial
  • Competition and antitrust
  • Construction and engineering
  • Consumer products
  • Corporate finance and M&A
  • Criminal
  • Education
  • Employment and benefits
  • Energy and natural resources
  • Environmental
  • Financial services
  • Fraud & white collar crime
  • Funds
  • Governance | risk and compliance
  • Government and public sector
  • Health and safety
  • Healthcare and pharmaceuticals
  • Insurance/Reinsurance
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation and dispute resolution
  • Logistics and transportation
  • Manufacturing and Industrial
  • Private client and family
  • Private equity
  • Projects and infrastructure
  • Real estate
  • Regulatory
  • Restructuring | insolvency and debt recovery
  • Shipping and maritime
  • Taxation
  • Technology media and telecoms
  • Travel and tourism
close

Registration

Registered Successfully!!!. We have sent you a confirmation email to your email address.
close


View My Saved News


close You must login to save your news
  • LOGIN
  • NEW USER

Login to your account

Forgotten your password?
or

Create an Account

close


View My Saved News


« Back

Legal wrangle over appointment of judges to ConCourt

The Judicial Service Commission’s recommendation of judges to South Africa’s apex court is flawed, writes Tania Broughton

Jul 19, 2021
Tania Broughton
Share

A review of the official record of the Judicial Service’s Commissions “deliberations” over who it favoured for two vacant positions on South Africa’s Constitutional Court were nothing more than “a sham”.

 

This is the view of Lawson Naidoo, the executive director of The Council for the Advancement of the Constitution (CASAC) which has launched court action to overturn the commission’s five recommendations for the posts, arguing that they were tainted by political agendas and score settling.

 

As part of the process, the JSC had to produce the record of its deliberations which led to its recommendations to President Cyril Rhamaposa, who was yet to pronounce on the issue.

Now Lawson has filed a further affidavit, saying the record shows that Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng had presented a “predetermined” list of his favourites which, barring one, the commissioners all just “blindly” agreed to, with no deliberations at all.

 

“It is now abundantly clear that the JSC has fundamentally misunderstood its function,” Lawson says.

 

“It failed to articulate any standard by which it was evaluating the candidates. It did not appear to consider itself bound by the standards mentioned in the Constitution.

 

“Its primary function is to deliberate.

“Yet, the record shows there was no deliberations at all. A pre-selected list was produced by Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng. He never explained how, where, when, why or with whom he prepared such a list.

 

“It was never subjected to an examination against any standard. 

“To this day, we are still in the dark as to why the JSC recommended the people on the list.”

 

Lawson said the list was presented within minutes of the commencement of the alleged deliberations when the Chief Justice announced that he would “guide the process”.

Lawson said the Chief Justice, in dealing with reasons for the exclusion of three interviewed candidates from his list had, in the case of two of them, “invented a rule” that they had less than three years experience on the Bench.

 

With regards to the third candidate, Judge Dhaya Pillay - he had simply said: “And Judge Pillay, I won’t say much really. I do not think Judge Pillay should be part of the list.”

 

This was after Pillay was grilled during the interview process about her friendship with Minister Pravin Gordhan which, Lawson submitted, was a “clear political attack”.

 

After presenting the list, the Chief Justice then “shut down the discussion” and suggested the commissioners vote.

 

“The conclusion is inescapable that it was not part of the Chief Justice’s plan to have any discussion. 

 

They (the commissioners) blindly followed the Chief Justice. Pillay did not receive a single vote.”

 

Lawson said the JSC had failed to adopt any discernible standard for its process.

 

When the application was first launched, Economic Freedom Fighters Leader Julius Malema, who sits on the commission as a parliamentary representative, labelled it “racist” and questioned “what is so special about that Indian Judge (Judge Pillay)”.

 

Lawson said his comments were regrettable “but entirely consistent with the way he and others on the JSC, treated Judge Pillay during her interview and closed their minds to her candidacy”.

 

The JSC has yet to file its opposing papers.

 

To join Africa Legal's mailing list please click here

Copyright : Re-publication of this article is authorised only in the following circumstances; the writer and Africa Legal are both recognised as the author and the website address www.africa-legal.com and original article link are back linked. A bio for the writer can be provided on request.

RELATED CATEGORY NEWS

“Patent abuse” challenged in South Afr Read more
Animal Law course open for registration Read more
Nigerian businesses get a legislative Read more

RELATED COUNTRY NEWS

Becoming a well-rounded lawyer Read more
The high cost of poor safety training Read more
Dispelling misconceptions Read more
Africa Legal
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Terms of use
  • Privacy and cookies policy
Members
  • Find a job
  • Take a course
  • Read news
  • Terms and conditions
  • Cancellations and refunds
Clients
  • Terms and conditions
  • Post a job
  • Host a course
  • Advertise
  • Share news
Connect with us
© Copyright 2023 | Africa Legal. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy