This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you consent to our use of cookies. Close

Africa Legal

Africa Legal

  • NEWS
  • JOBS
  • COURSES
  • CLIENTS
    • Sign in
    • Sign up
  • NEWS
  • COURSES
  • JOBS
    • Sign In
    • Sign Up
  • News
  • Courses
  • Jobs
  • Events
  • Business A-Z
  • Post a job
  • Contact Us
  • Clients
CLIENT SIGN IN
Country
  • Uganda
  • South Africa
  • Kenya
  • Nigeria
  • Cameroon
  • United Kingdom
  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Ghana
  • Tanzania
  • Zambia
  • Botswana
  • Morocco
  • Zimbabwe
  • Mauritius
  • Mozambique
  • Sudan
  • Rwanda
  • Ethiopia
  • Angola
  • Egypt
  • Togo
  • Mali
  • South Sudan
  • Swaziland
  • Senegal
  • Malawi
  • France
  • Guinea
  • Middle East
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Gambia
  • Sierra Leone
  • Germany
Category
  • Profiles
  • Analysis & Opinion
  • Career advice
  • In-house
  • Latest news
  • Press releases
  • Africa Legal Blog
  • Women in Law
  • Innovation
  • Human Rights
Practice area
  • Agriculture
  • Arbitration
  • Aviation
  • Banking and Finance
  • Capital markets
  • Charties and pro bono
  • Company commercial
  • Competition and antitrust
  • Construction and engineering
  • Consumer products
  • Corporate finance and M&A
  • Criminal
  • Education
  • Employment and benefits
  • Energy and natural resources
  • Environmental
  • Financial services
  • Fraud & white collar crime
  • Funds
  • Governance | risk and compliance
  • Government and public sector
  • Health and safety
  • Healthcare and pharmaceuticals
  • Insurance/Reinsurance
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation and dispute resolution
  • Logistics and transportation
  • Manufacturing and Industrial
  • Private client and family
  • Private equity
  • Projects and infrastructure
  • Real estate
  • Regulatory
  • Restructuring | insolvency and debt recovery
  • Shipping and maritime
  • Taxation
  • Technology media and telecoms
  • Travel and tourism
close

Registration

Registered Successfully!!!. We have sent you a confirmation email to your email address.
close


View My Saved News


close You must login to save your news
  • LOGIN
  • NEW USER

Login to your account

Forgotten your password?
or

Create an Account

close


View My Saved News


« Back

Devenish on Basic Income Grant

More than three years ago, at the height of the Zuma presidency, Professor George Devenish argued that a basic income grant could satisfy the constitutional requirement to cater for the basic needs of South Africa’s very poor. In this column, published in the Mail and Guardian, he tried to stimulate debate on the issue but there were no takers.

Jul 25, 2018
Professor Devenish
Share

I refer to the excellent letter penned by Motsomi Maubane entitled: “R1 million grant to each citizen can empower all” in the Mail and Guardian of January 18-22, 2015. This is wishful thinking. A basic income grant is far more realistic and deserves serious consideration and debate. Furthermore, it could be introduced incrementally to make it more affordable.

I am of the view that such a grant is urgently needed for both political stability and social justice in South Africa. Although, inter alia, the Basic Income Grant Coalition, Cosatu and the DA are in favour of this grant in one form or another, and the ANC, the government, are opposed to it and have refused to implement it, indicating that it is unaffordable.

The Coalition has called for a universal, non-means tested grant. The reason for this is that a means test has proven to be a barrier to the very poor and destitute accessing social grants. A basic income grant is a measure that could give effect to the constitutional requirement to cater for the immediate basic needs of an estimated 13 million persons who are living below the poverty datum line in South Africa. It is submitted that it is a constitutional imperative that some meaningful measure of access to social security is required for these persons. A basic income grant is one means of doing this.

The basic income grant is a bold and innovative proposal that would give social assistance a major role in poverty alleviation.  Although it is not a panacea, the proposal of a basic income grant goes beyond the residual function of ad hoc social assistance as a social safety net and could facilitate the involvement of poor people in South Africa in the economic development and upliftment of South Africa. This would occur through what is known as the second or ancillary economy.

Those who propose a basic income grant perceive structural poverty and inequality as a fundamental reality and challenge in the real politik of South Africa. I firmly believe that a basic income grant could play a seminal role in addressing subsistence needs in our society, thereby empowering the poor and destitute to begin to participate in the economy. Given the inordinate inequalities in the economy and society, a major social assistance programme like a basic income grant is also a mechanism for income redistribution that will also promote greater economic equality and social justice and stability.

The Basic Income Grant Coalition has carried out research which shows that the grant is the most effective policy option for eliminating destitution and reducing poverty. It gives everyone a real stake in South Africa’s future and has the potential to transform South Africa.

It can be argued that at this time, when fiscal discipline and austerity is the order of the day, this kind of grant is unaffordable. However, the grant could be introduced incrementally over a period of five years. If the government is able to envisage spending more than a trillion rand on a questionable programme involving the Russians to develop nuclear electric power in the future, the economic feasibility of  the grant deserves to be investigated. In my view what is required is a vigorous and informed debate between the different role players on this crucial issue in order to induce the government to commit themselves to the principle of such a grant. I have tried to kickstart such a discourse by raising the issue at party political meetings and by discussion in the media, but alas, without any success.

RELATED CATEGORY NEWS

Niche firms with elephant-sized impact Read more
Custodians of risk and reward Read more
An insightful look at competition, tra Read more

RELATED COUNTRY NEWS

Hogan Lovells bolsters SA practice Read more
Two years of WMN striding ahead Read more
Transforming the global future Read more
Africa Legal
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Terms of use
  • Privacy and cookies policy
Members
  • Find a job
  • Take a course
  • Read news
  • Terms and conditions
  • Cancellations and refunds
Clients
  • Terms and conditions
  • Post a job
  • Host a course
  • Advertise
  • Share news
Connect with us
© Copyright 2023 | Africa Legal. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy