This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you consent to our use of cookies. Close

Africa Legal

Africa Legal

  • NEWS
  • JOBS
  • COURSES
  • CLIENTS
    • Sign in
    • Sign up
  • NEWS
  • COURSES
  • JOBS
    • Sign In
    • Sign Up
  • News
  • Courses
  • Jobs
  • Events
  • Business A-Z
  • Post a job
  • Contact Us
  • Clients
CLIENT SIGN IN
Country
  • Uganda
  • South Africa
  • Kenya
  • Nigeria
  • Cameroon
  • United Kingdom
  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Ghana
  • Tanzania
  • Zambia
  • Botswana
  • Morocco
  • Zimbabwe
  • Mauritius
  • Mozambique
  • Sudan
  • Rwanda
  • Ethiopia
  • Angola
  • Egypt
  • Togo
  • Mali
  • South Sudan
  • Swaziland
  • Senegal
  • Malawi
  • France
  • Guinea
  • Middle East
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Gambia
  • Sierra Leone
  • Germany
Category
  • Profiles
  • Analysis & Opinion
  • Career advice
  • In-house
  • Latest news
  • Press releases
  • Africa Legal Blog
  • Women in Law
  • Innovation
  • Human Rights
Practice area
  • Agriculture
  • Arbitration
  • Aviation
  • Banking and Finance
  • Capital markets
  • Charties and pro bono
  • Company commercial
  • Competition and antitrust
  • Construction and engineering
  • Consumer products
  • Corporate finance and M&A
  • Criminal
  • Education
  • Employment and benefits
  • Energy and natural resources
  • Environmental
  • Financial services
  • Fraud & white collar crime
  • Funds
  • Governance | risk and compliance
  • Government and public sector
  • Health and safety
  • Healthcare and pharmaceuticals
  • Insurance/Reinsurance
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation and dispute resolution
  • Logistics and transportation
  • Manufacturing and Industrial
  • Private client and family
  • Private equity
  • Projects and infrastructure
  • Real estate
  • Regulatory
  • Restructuring | insolvency and debt recovery
  • Shipping and maritime
  • Taxation
  • Technology media and telecoms
  • Travel and tourism
close

Registration

Registered Successfully!!!. We have sent you a confirmation email to your email address.
close


View My Saved News


close You must login to save your news
  • LOGIN
  • NEW USER

Login to your account

Forgotten your password?
or

Create an Account

close


View My Saved News


« Back

Boost for squatters’ rights

In an important court ruling regarding “squatters’ rights”, three South African judges have found that the City of Cape Town misapplied the law when it demolished shacks and evicted families from several informal settlements during the Covid-19 lockdown, writes Tania Broughton.

Jul 21, 2022
Tania Broughton
Share

The law in question was that of counter spoliation – a legal remedy which allows people to forcibly re-take possession of property unlawfully taken from them.

The case had its genesis in the widely circulated forced eviction by city officials of a naked man, Bulelani Qolani, from his informal structure in a Cape Town township and the subsequent destruction of his “home” with crowbars.

Judges Vincent Saldanha, Mokgoatji Dolamo and Hayley Slingers said the City had been applying counter spoliation provisions far too broadly, believing that it could demolish half-built and unoccupied informal structures without a court order and without complying with the evictions provisions contained in the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land (PIE) Act.

The judges – noting both the desperation of homeless people in South Africa and the ever increasing problem of land invasions, some for “nefarious and political reasons” – ruled that counter spoliation was neither unconstitutional nor invalid. However, they said, it could only be used in limited circumstances.

The City’s belief that it could use the remedy “at any stage before a fully constructed informal structure becomes occupied as a home” was misguided and wrong. They said it might be appropriate, for example, if someone was just putting pegs in the ground, but when a structure was half built the provisions of PIE kicked in.

In a statement, the City of Cape Town said it was considering appealing aspects of the court’s interpretation “as affording landowners only the narrowest of windows to protect property”.

“The City conducted 993 anti-land invasion operations in 2020/21 during the height of the national lockdown and large-scale orchestrated illegal occupation attempts, which led to the formation of some 159 settlements, mostly on uninhabitable, unserviceable land, at great health and safety risks. 

“It is not feasible to follow lengthy court processes before responding to coordinated invasions, which are often backed by criminal syndicates seeking to profit from illegal plot-selling and electricity connections.”

The city said the court’s view could render  protection of immovable property “all but impossible in practice”. However, the shack dwellers movement, Abahlali baseMjondolo, which acted as amicus curiae in the matter, welcomed the ruling. In the court, it argued that the routine and inflexible use of the counter spoliation remedy was at odds with the city’s constitutional duty to give effect to the rights of poor and homeless people to access adequate housing. 

In finding that the series of demolitions and evictions, including that of Qolani, were unlawful and unconstitutional, the movement said the court had accepted its submissions that the right to counter spoliate was significantly narrower than the state and property owners had traditionally accepted.

“This means that once a person is present on land with the intent to construct a shack, and manifests that intent by beginning to erect a structure, they are (deemed to be) in possession and a court order is required to remove them.”

 

To join Africa Legal's mailing list please click here

Copyright : Re-publication of this article is authorised only in the following circumstances; the writer and Africa Legal are both recognised as the author and the website address www.africa-legal.com and original article link are back linked. A bio for the writer can be provided on request.

RELATED CATEGORY NEWS

“Patent abuse” challenged in South Afr Read more
Animal Law course open for registration Read more
Nigerian businesses get a legislative Read more

RELATED COUNTRY NEWS

Becoming a well-rounded lawyer Read more
The high cost of poor safety training Read more
Dispelling misconceptions Read more
Africa Legal
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Terms of use
  • Privacy and cookies policy
Members
  • Find a job
  • Take a course
  • Read news
  • Terms and conditions
  • Cancellations and refunds
Clients
  • Terms and conditions
  • Post a job
  • Host a course
  • Advertise
  • Share news
Connect with us
© Copyright 2023 | Africa Legal. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy